Michigan/To do/Main: Difference between revisions Discussion View history

(*/To_do/Main*/)
(*/To_do/Main*/)
Line 8: Line 8:
For spreadsheets above, comments can be inserted, but edits are locked. Send a PM to [http://www.waze.com/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&subject=MI%20Resource%20Wiki:&username=davielde davielde] for editing access.
For spreadsheets above, comments can be inserted, but edits are locked. Send a PM to [http://www.waze.com/forum/ucp.php?i=pm&mode=compose&subject=MI%20Resource%20Wiki:&username=davielde davielde] for editing access.


====Road Lock Standards====
====Last SkiDooGuy Proposed Road Lock Standard====
This chart uses information posted in the [http://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=943&t=118338&start=50#p1004402 GLR Forum Thread: Great Lakes Road Lock Standards]
 
{{Locking Standard|Fwy=5|Ramp=5|MH=3|mH=3|PS=2|Street=1}}
 
====Alternate Proposed Road Lock Standard====
{{Lock Standard State|MI}}
{{Lock Standard State|MI}}


<!---- DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ----
<!---- DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ------ DO NOT MODIFY BELOW ----

Revision as of 21:31, 8 July 2015


For spreadsheets above, comments can be inserted, but edits are locked. Send a PM to davielde for editing access.

Last SkiDooGuy Proposed Road Lock Standard

This chart uses information posted in the GLR Forum Thread: Great Lakes Road Lock Standards

In Michigan we have a set minimum standard for locking roads based on segment type. Any road of a certain segment type must be locked at least to the rank (level) in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (areas with construction, tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.

A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current US road type standards.

Michigan Minimum Locking Rank Standard
Segment Type Default locks
 Freeway  5
 Ramp  5
 Major Highway  3
 Minor Highway  3
 Primary Street  2
 Street  1
 • • • • Ferry • • • •   5
 |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-| Railroad |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|  2


Alternate Proposed Road Lock Standard

The following defines a set of minimum locking standards proposed for all roads within Michigan. Any road of a certain type or category must be locked at least to the level in the chart below. Roads may be locked higher for protection and special situations (tricky design, frequent mistakes, imaging inaccuracies, and the like), but should not be locked lower.

It is understood that more rural or inactive areas may not yet meet this standard: editors are encouraged to recruit and mentor additional editors to build coverage.

A great time to implement these locks is while bringing the road types of an area into compliance with the current US road type standards (FC and highway systems). Lock the roads based on type after they've been set to current US Road Type Standards.

Michigan Minimum Road Locking Standard
Segment Type Two-way   One-way 
 Freeway  5
 Ramp  Highest lock of connected segment
 Major Highway  3
 Minor Highway  3
 Primary Street  2 3
 Street  1 2
 Private Road  1 2
 Parking Lot Road  1 1see note
 • • • • Ferry • • • •   5
 |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-| Railroad |-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|  2
 ⁃     ⁃        ⁃        ⁃        ⁃ Runway ⁃        ⁃        ⁃        ⁃        ⁃  5
Other named types 1 2
Construction (outdated imagery) 3
Waze Beacons installed 6

Note: One-way PLRs used outside of parking lots, such as alleys and streets through apartment complexes, should be locked at 2. See the GLR major roads page for additional information on the standards listed here.