Rhode Island/To do: Difference between revisions Discussion View history

(Completed RI-10)
(46 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
------ DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE -------- DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE ------>  
------ DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE -------- DO NOT MODIFY ABOVE THIS LINE ------>  


Want to help out with the map in [[Rhode Island]]? Below is a list of projects that need to be done. Please see [[Map Editing (new Editor)| Map Editing]] & [[Best map editing practice| Editing Best Practices]] for a starting point on how to edit the map.
Want to help out with the map in [[Rhode Island]]? Below, you'll find a number of projects that are currently in progress around the state. If you would like to participate, please update the table below with your progress, and mark the appropriate cell with a yellow background color. Once that portion is 100% complete, indicate this with a green background color.


When you are done, please update the info & turn the background gray. If you need help see [[Help:Wiki editing|How to edit wiki pages]]. Sounds scary but it's [http://www.commoncraft.com/video-wikis-plain-english easy] just watch this short video.
If you need to know how to update the wiki, check out [[Help:Wiki editing|this article]] about wiki editing. You can also watch [http://www.commoncraft.com/video-wikis-plain-english this short video] to get a better idea on how to modify the wiki.


== Proposed Freeways ==
Happy editing!


This section is for proposed upgrades of Major Highways to Freeways that meet the definition of "controlled-access highway." This is only a draft, please do not change the road type of these roads until consensus is reached.
=== Speed Limits: Streets ===
Thanks to the [[Rhode Island/Mapraid Rhode Island 2016| Map Raid]], Rhode Island is in the top 10 for speed limit implementation across the country! But there's still a lot of work to be done, as the Map Raid only focused on non-street speed limits. This section is for tracking the progress of adding speed limits to all the street segments in the state and getting us even closer to 100% implementation.


* [http://www.waze.com/editor/?env=usa&lon=-71.39370&lat=41.51592&layers=901&zoom=1&segments=63497538,61997034,70202071,70202069,43457294,70213187 RI-138 between US-1 and RI-238]
=== Village Confirmation ===
* [http://www.waze.com/editor/?env=usa&lon=-71.42773&lat=41.89525&layers=901&zoom=0&segments=64614371,70253826,70249137,65641493 RI-146 between I-95 and RI-99]
During the [[Rhode Island/Mapraid Rhode Island 2016| Map Raid]], one of the main goals was to implement Rhode Island's [[Rhode Island/Cities and towns| Villages policy]]. While most of the work was very well done, there was still some confusion on how to implement it. This project is for confirming that all roads and places adhere to the existing village guidelines, which includes having the village name be the primary city name on all segments and places within the village, and proper naming of segments with route numbers.
* [http://www.waze.com/editor/?env=usa&lon=-71.54134&lat=41.99132&layers=901&zoom=1&segments=70269152,70269150,70268308,76381544,70268435 RI-146 between RI-146A and MA border]


== State Highway Naming ==
=== School Places ===
This section tracks the progress of the effort to rename all state highways in Rhode Island with the designation '''RI-XXX'''. The goal is to have all numbered routes in the state use this designation to allow for route shields to appear on the Waze app.  
Given that most schools in the state of Rhode Island consist of a single large building with unique shapes, it was decided that all schools that fit this description should have their Place areas conform to the shape of the building rather than to the boundaries of the property (as is the case with universities and other multi-building complexes). Thus, this project is tracking the progress of updating the existing school Area Places to match this guideline, or adding school Place Areas where none exist.


If you would like to contribute to this effort, please add your notes and name to the route that you are verifying and change the row's background color to gray once the route has been verified.
=== Functional Classification confirmation ===
With RIDOT recently updating their [http://www.planning.ri.gov/planning-areas/transportation/highway-functional-classification-by-municipality.php|functional functional classifications], it's time for another review of road types in Rhode Island. Note that you can use the [https://greasyfork.org/en/scripts/369633-wme-fc-layer WME FC Layer] script to easily catch discrepancies on the map. Just remember that the script isn't 100% infallible, so be sure to check for things like federal and state routes affecting FC.


Please refer to [http://www.dot.ri.gov/documents/maps/RI_Highway_Map.pdf this map] to determine which roads cover which routes. Also check out the [[{{BasePage2}}#Route_Naming|RI Route Naming Rules]] to ensure correct usage of RI-XXX in primary and alternate names.
{| class="wikitable" width="100%"
 
! Town/Village
 
! Street SL
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
! Villages
|- align="center"
! Schools
! scope="col" width="50pt" bgcolor="#00CC00"|Route
! FC
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="#00CC00"|County(s)
! Comments
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="#00CC00"|Verified By
|-
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="#00CC00"|Date Verified
| style="font-weight:bold" | Ashaway
! scope="col" width="300pt" bgcolor="#00CC00"|Notes
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Ashaway Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| 1A || Washington || GooberKing || || Westerly portion done
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Ashaway Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 2 ||
| <!-- Ashaway Comments -->
Washington
|-
Kent
| style="font-weight:bold" | Barrington
Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Barrington Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
| 3 ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Barrington Functional Classification Percentage -->
Washington
| <!-- Barrington Comments -->
Kent
|-
|| || ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Bradford
|- align="center" bgcolor="grey"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Bradford Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 4 ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
Washington
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
Kent
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Bradford Functional Classification Percentage -->
|| GooberKing || 09/17/2015 ||
| <!-- Bradford Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 5 ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Bristol
Kent
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Bristol Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
Providence
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Bristol School Places Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Bristol Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 7 || Providence || || ||
| <!-- Bristol Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="grey"
|-
| 10 || Providence || GooberKing || 09/17/2015 ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Burrillville
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Burrillville Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 12 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| 14 ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Burrillville Functional Classification Percentage -->
Kent
| <!-- Burrillville Comments -->
Providence
|-
|| || ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Carolina
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Carolina Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 15 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| 24 || Newport || || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Carolina Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- Carolina Comments -->
| 33 ||
|-
Kent
| style="font-weight:bold" | Central Falls
Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Central Falls Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|| || ||  
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Central Falls School Places Percentage -->
| 37 ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Central Falls Functional Classification Percentage -->
Kent
| <!-- Central Falls Comments -->
Providence
|-
|| || ||  
| style="font-weight:bold" | Charlestown
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Charlestown Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 51 ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
Kent
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Charlestown School Places Percentage -->
Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Charlestown Functional Classification Percentage -->
|| || ||
| <!-- Charlestown Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 77 || Newport || || ||  
| style="font-weight:bold" | Chepachet
|- align="center" bgcolor="grey"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Chepachet Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 78 || Washington || MojaveCactusMonkey || 7/19/15 ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Chepachet Village Implementation Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| 81 || Newport || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Chepachet Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- Chepachet Comments -->
| 91 || Washington || || ||  
|-
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="font-weight:bold" | Clayville
| 94 || Providence || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Clayville Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| 96 || Providence || || ||  
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Clayville Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 98 || Providence || || ||  
| <!-- Clayville Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 99 || Providence || || ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Coventry
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Coventry Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 100 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Coventry School Places Percentage -->
| 101 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Coventry Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- Coventry Comments -->
| 102 ||
|-
Washington
| style="font-weight:bold" | Cranston
Kent
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Cranston Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
Providence
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Cranston Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 103 ||
| <!-- Cranston Comments -->
Providence
|-
Bristol
| style="font-weight:bold" | Cumberland
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Cumberland Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| 103A ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Cumberland School Places Percentage -->
Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Cumberland Functional Classification Percentage -->
Bristol
| <!-- Cumberland Comments -->
|| || ||
|-
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="font-weight:bold" | East Greenwich
| 104 || Providence || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- East Greenwich Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| 107 || Providence || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- East Greenwich School Places Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- East Greenwich Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 108 || Washington || || ||  
| <!-- East Greenwich Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="grey"
|-
| 110 || Washington || GooberKing || 09/10/2015 ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | East Providence
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- East Providence Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 112 || Washington || || ||  
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- East Providence School Places Percentage -->
| 113 || Kent || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- East Providence Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- East Providence Comments -->
| 114 ||
|-
Newport
| style="font-weight:bold" | Exeter
Bristol
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Exeter Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
Providence
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Exeter School Places Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Exeter Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 114A || Providence || ||  ||  
| <!-- Exeter Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 115 ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Foster
Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Foster Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
Kent
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Foster Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 116 || Providence || || ||  
| <!-- Foster Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 117 ||  
| style="font-weight:bold" | Greene
Kent
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greene Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greene Village Implementation Percentage -->
|| || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greene School Places Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greene Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 117A || Kent || || ||
| <!-- Greene Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 118 || Kent || || ||  
| style="font-weight:bold" | Greenville
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greenville Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 120 || Providence || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greenville Village Implementation Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greenville School Places Percentage -->
| 121 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Greenville Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- Greenville Comments -->
| 122 || Providence || || ||
|-
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="font-weight:bold" | Harrisville
| 123 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Harrisville  Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Harrisville Village Implementation Percentage -->
| 126 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Harrisville Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 128 || Providence || || ||  
| <!-- Harrisville Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 136 || Bristol || || ||  
| style="font-weight:bold" | Hope
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Hope Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 138 ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
Washington
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
Newport
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Hope Functional Classification Percentage -->
|| || ||
| <!-- Hope Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 138A || Newport || || ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Hope Valley
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Hope Valley Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 146 || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| 146A || Providence || || ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Hope Valley Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- Hope Valley Comments -->
| 152 || Providence || || ||  
|-
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="font-weight:bold" | Hopkinton
| 165 || Washington || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Hopkinton Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| 177 || Newport || || ||  
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Hopkinton Functional Classification Percentage -->
| 179 || Newport || || ||  
| <!-- Hopkinton Comments -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|-
| 214 || Newport || || ||
| style="font-weight:bold" | Jamestown
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Jamestown Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| 216 || Washington || || ||  
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| 238 || Newport || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Jamestown Functional Classification Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| <!-- Jamestown Comments -->
| 246 || Providence || || ||  
|-
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="font-weight:bold" | Johnston
| 401 || Kent || || ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Johnston Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| 402 ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Johnston School Places Percentage -->
Kent
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Johnston Functional Classification Percentage -->
Washington
| <!-- Johnston Comments -->
|| || ||
|-
|- align="center" bgcolor="grey"
| style="font-weight:bold" | Kenyon
| 403 ||
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Kenyon Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
Kent
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
Washington
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
|| GooberKing || 09/17/2015 ||  
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Kenyon Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Kenyon Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Kingston
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Kingston Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100̤%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Kingston Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Kingston Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Lincoln
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Lincoln Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Lincoln School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Lincoln Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Lincoln Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Little Compton
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Little Compton Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Little Compton Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Little Compton Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Manville
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Manville Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Manville Village Implementation Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Manville Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Manville Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Mapleville
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Mapleville Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Mapleville Village Implementation Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Mapleville Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Mapleville Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Middletown
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Middletown Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Middletown School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Middletown Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Middletown Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Narragansett
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Narragansett Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Narragansett School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Narragansett Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Narragansett Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | New Shoreham
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- New Shoreham Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- New Shoreham Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- New Shoreham Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Newport
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Newport Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Newport School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Newport Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Newport Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | North Kingstown
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Kingstown Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Kingstown School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Kingstown Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- North Kingstown Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | North Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Providence Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Providence Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- North Providence Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | North Scituate
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Scituate Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Scituate Village Implementation Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Scituate Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- North Scituate Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | North Smithfield
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Smithfield Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- North Smithfield Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- North Smithfield Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Oakland
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Oakland Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Oakland Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Oakland Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Pascoag
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Pascoag Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Pascoag Village Implementation Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Pascoag Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Pascoag Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Pawtucket
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Pawtucket Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Pawtucket School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Pawtucket Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Pawtucket Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Portsmouth
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Portsmouth Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Portsmouth School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Portsmouth Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Portsmouth Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Providence
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Providence Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ffd" | 50%<br />GooberKing
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Providence Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Providence Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Riverside
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Riverside Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Riverside Village Implementation Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Riverside School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Riverside Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Riverside Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Rumford
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Rumford Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Rumford Village Implementation Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Rumford School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Rumford Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Rumford Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Saunderstown
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Saunderstown Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Saunderstown Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Saunderstown Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Scituate
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Scituate Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Scituate Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Scituate Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Shannock
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Shannock Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Shannock Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Shannock Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Slatersville
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Slatersville Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Slatersville Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Slatersville Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Slocum
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Slocum Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Slocum Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Slocum Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Smithfield
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Smithfield Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" |100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Smithfield Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Smithfield Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Tiverton
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Tiverton Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Tiverton School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Tiverton Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Tiverton Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Wakefield
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wakefield Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wakefield School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wakefield Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Wakefield Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Warren
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Warren Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Warren School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Warren Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Warren Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Warwick
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Warwick  Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Warwick School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Warwick Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Warwick Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | West Kingston
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Kingston Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Kingston Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- West Kingston Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | West Greenwich
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Greenwich Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color: #ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Greenwich School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Greenwich Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- West Greenwich Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | West Warwick
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Warwick Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center; background-color: #ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Warwick School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- West Warwick Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- West Warwick Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Westerly
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Westerly Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center; background-color: #ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Westerly School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Westerly Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Westerly Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Wood River Junction
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wood River Junction Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wood River Junction Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Wood River Junction Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Woonsocket
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Woonsocket Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center; background-color: #ddd" | N/A
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Woonsocket School Places Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Woonsocket Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Woonsocket Comments -->
|-
| style="font-weight:bold" | Wyoming
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wyoming Street Speed Limits Percentage -->
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center;background-color:#dfd" | 100%
| style="text-align: center" | <!-- Wyoming Functional Classification Percentage -->
| <!-- Wyoming Comments -->
|}
|}
== Functional Classifications ==
This section tracks the progress of validating RI's Functional Classification of roads (as discussed [http://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=276&t=85397 here]) against the new RIDOT 2015 Functional Classification definitions. If you would like to contribute to this effort, add your name to the list of Editors for the town you're validating and update the progress and notes based on what is still left to be done.
Validation should be based on the [http://www.planning.ri.gov/statewideplanning/transportation/reclass.php RIDOT Functional Classification Maps]. Items highlighted in yellow indicate validation in this town is currently in progress. Click each town name to see the Functional Classification Map for that town.
{| border="1" cellpadding="2"
|- align="center"
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="pink"|Town
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="pink"|Editor
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="pink"|Date Started
! scope="col" width="100pt" bgcolor="pink"|Progress
! scope="col" width="300pt" bgcolor="pink"|Comment
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/barrington.pdf Barrington] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Bristol.pdf Bristol] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Burrillville.pdf Burrillville] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/table/CentralFalls_110514.pdf Central Falls] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Charlestown.pdf Charlestown] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Coventry.pdf Coventry] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Cranston.pdf Cranston] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Cumberland.pdf Cumberland] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/East_Greenwich.pdf East Greenwich] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/East_Providence.pdf East Providence] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Exeter.pdf Exeter] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Foster.pdf Foster] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Glocester.pdf Glocester] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Hopkinton.pdf Hopkinton] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Jamestown.pdf Jamestown] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Johnston.pdf Johnston] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Lincoln.pdf Lincoln] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Little_Compton.pdf Little Compton] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Middletown.pdf Middletown] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Narragansett.pdf Narragansett] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/New_Shoreham.pdf New Shoreham] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Newport.pdf Newport] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/North_Kingstown.pdf North Kingstown] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/North_Providence.pdf North Providence] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/North_Smithfield.pdf North Smithfield] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Pawtucket.pdf Pawtucket] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Portsmouth.pdf Portsmouth] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Providence.pdf Providence] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Richmond.pdf Richmond] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Scituate.pdf Scituate] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Smithfield.pdf Smithfield] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/South_Kingstown.pdf South Kingstown] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Tiverton.pdf Tiverton] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Warren.pdf Warren] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Warwick.pdf Warwick] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/West_Greenwich.pdf West Greenwich] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/West_Warwick.pdf West Warwick] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Westerly.pdf Westerly] || || || ||
|- align="center" bgcolor="white"
|[http://www.planning.ri.gov/documents/trans/func_class/Map/Woonsocket.pdf Woonsocket] || || || ||
|}
== Important Places ==
TBD
== Unknown Roads ==
TBD
== Town Names ==
TBD

Revision as of 21:35, 5 July 2019


Want to help out with the map in Rhode Island? Below, you'll find a number of projects that are currently in progress around the state. If you would like to participate, please update the table below with your progress, and mark the appropriate cell with a yellow background color. Once that portion is 100% complete, indicate this with a green background color.

If you need to know how to update the wiki, check out this article about wiki editing. You can also watch this short video to get a better idea on how to modify the wiki.

Happy editing!

Speed Limits: Streets

Thanks to the Map Raid, Rhode Island is in the top 10 for speed limit implementation across the country! But there's still a lot of work to be done, as the Map Raid only focused on non-street speed limits. This section is for tracking the progress of adding speed limits to all the street segments in the state and getting us even closer to 100% implementation.

Village Confirmation

During the Map Raid, one of the main goals was to implement Rhode Island's Villages policy. While most of the work was very well done, there was still some confusion on how to implement it. This project is for confirming that all roads and places adhere to the existing village guidelines, which includes having the village name be the primary city name on all segments and places within the village, and proper naming of segments with route numbers.

School Places

Given that most schools in the state of Rhode Island consist of a single large building with unique shapes, it was decided that all schools that fit this description should have their Place areas conform to the shape of the building rather than to the boundaries of the property (as is the case with universities and other multi-building complexes). Thus, this project is tracking the progress of updating the existing school Area Places to match this guideline, or adding school Place Areas where none exist.

Functional Classification confirmation

With RIDOT recently updating their functional classifications, it's time for another review of road types in Rhode Island. Note that you can use the WME FC Layer script to easily catch discrepancies on the map. Just remember that the script isn't 100% infallible, so be sure to check for things like federal and state routes affecting FC.

Town/Village Street SL Villages Schools FC Comments
Ashaway 100% 100%
Barrington N/A 100%
Bradford 100% 100%
Bristol N/A
Burrillville N/A N/A
Carolina 100% N/A
Central Falls N/A
Charlestown N/A
Chepachet 100%
Clayville 100% 100%
Coventry N/A
Cranston N/A 100%
Cumberland N/A
East Greenwich N/A
East Providence N/A
Exeter N/A
Foster N/A 100%
Greene
Greenville
Harrisville 100%
Hope 100% 100%
Hope Valley 100% 100%
Hopkinton N/A N/A
Jamestown N/A 100%
Johnston N/A
Kenyon 100% N/A
Kingston 100% 100̤%
Lincoln N/A
Little Compton N/A 100%
Manville 100%
Mapleville N/A
Middletown N/A
Narragansett N/A
New Shoreham N/A 100%
Newport N/A
North Kingstown N/A
North Providence N/A 100%
North Scituate 100%
North Smithfield N/A 100%
Oakland 100% N/A
Pascoag 100%
Pawtucket N/A
Portsmouth N/A
Providence N/A 50%
GooberKing
Riverside
Rumford
Saunderstown 100% 100%
Scituate N/A N/A
Shannock 100% N/A
Slatersville 100% N/A
Slocum 100% N/A
Smithfield N/A 100%
Tiverton N/A
Wakefield 100%
Warren N/A
Warwick N/A
West Kingston 100% 100%
West Greenwich N/A
West Warwick N/A
Westerly N/A
Wood River Junction 100% 100%
Woonsocket N/A
Wyoming 100% 100%