Difference between revisions of "Talk:Limited Access Interchange Style Guide"

From Wazeopedia
(Created section for note and updated link)
Line 8: Line 8:
  
 
:The original link using the old editor. The new editor link is [http://www.waze.com/editor/?lon=-94.57857&lat=39.09973&zoom=15&layers=503&env=usa here]. ''[[User:Kentsmith9|kentsmith9]] ([[User talk:Kentsmith9|talk]]) 23:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)''
 
:The original link using the old editor. The new editor link is [http://www.waze.com/editor/?lon=-94.57857&lat=39.09973&zoom=15&layers=503&env=usa here]. ''[[User:Kentsmith9|kentsmith9]] ([[User talk:Kentsmith9|talk]]) 23:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)''
 +
 +
== Collector / Distributor section ==
 +
 +
[http://www.waze.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=276&t=83197&sid=d4f9fa068157c12c1e056d5af9cb1c1c&p=732302#p724767 Forum notes] to change the guidance to allow the new detour avoidance to take care of off-on freeway routing. ''[[User:Kentsmith9|kentsmith9]] ([[User talk:Kentsmith9|talk]]) 23:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)''

Revision as of 23:31, 21 March 2014

Reverse diamond is missing

I just thought I'd discuss a missing interchange, the reverse diamond, or common name as diverging diamond. I have a good example in KC off 435 and Front Street [1]. Even Joplin has one and they are building one right now SW of Olathe for the BNSF intermodal.


But one thing though in the complex urban interchange is for divided streets/highways that use them too. Is the lack of mention of it merely because of the excessive complexity to save time here? Thanks!

The1who 12:52, January 6, 2013

The original link using the old editor. The new editor link is here. kentsmith9 (talk) 23:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Collector / Distributor section

Forum notes to change the guidance to allow the new detour avoidance to take care of off-on freeway routing. kentsmith9 (talk) 23:31, 21 March 2014 (UTC)