User:Atrophicshiner/sandbox View history

m (acute image replace with no annotation)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
==Turn lanes==
==Turn lanes==
Firstly, the majority of junctions do '''not''' need turn lanes at all. Waze gives advanced warning of upcoming turns, it is up to the user to pick the relevant lane for the approaching turn. Turn lanes are only really needed if they are really long, or the junction is sufficiently complicated to need clearer navigation instructions.
The majority of junctions do '''not''' need turn lanes at all. Waze gives advanced warning of upcoming turns, it is up to the user to pick the relevant lane for the approaching turn. Turn lanes should '''only''' be considered if there is a clear issue ''usually'' raised via MPs or URs. A lot of turn lanes are present on the map from the original basemap import and '''can be removed'''.


===When not to map turn lanes===
===Do not to map turn lanes when...===
*When the turn lane is '''too short''' (less than 200 ft or 60 m)  
* the turn lane is '''too short''' (less than 200 ft or 60 m)  
*When the turn lane is '''not distinct''' from the main carriageway
* the turn lane is '''not distinct''', only separated by a painted line, from the main direction of travel
*When the turn lane splits '''at or near''' the main carriageway<!-- The term "main carriageway" confused me for a short time, as it suggests the "road that isn't the side road". Not sure how we can make this clearer though. -T --> stop or give way line.
* the turn lane splits '''at or near''' the main junction<!-- The term "main carriageway" confused me for a short time, as it suggests the "road that isn't the side road". Not sure how we can make this clearer though. -T --> stop or give way line.


{| align="center"
{| align="center"

Revision as of 14:53, 30 November 2017

Turn lanes

The majority of junctions do not need turn lanes at all. Waze gives advanced warning of upcoming turns, it is up to the user to pick the relevant lane for the approaching turn. Turn lanes should only be considered if there is a clear issue usually raised via MPs or URs. A lot of turn lanes are present on the map from the original basemap import and can be removed.

Do not to map turn lanes when...

  • the turn lane is too short (less than 200 ft or 60 m)
  • the turn lane is not distinct, only separated by a painted line, from the main direction of travel
  • the turn lane splits at or near the main junction stop or give way line.
Turn lane too short
Turn lane not distinct
Splits at or near stop line

When turn lane may need mapping

  • When the turn lane splits from the main carriageway with a physical barrier separation
  • When an acute angle may lead the user to misunderstand the location of the turn
  • When mapping only some of several turn lanes at a junction unbalances that junction
  • For better control of u-turns when junction is too wide to trigger the u-turn prevention mechanism
  • Complex junctions that benefit from additional instructions.
File:Example.png
Physical barrier separation
Acute angle of junction
File:Example.png
Balanced junction
Complex junction

If turn lanes really are of benefit to the driver, then they should be mapped in the following way:

  • The turn lane segments should have no name, so that the instructions read out the name of the next street.
  • The Road Type should match the type of the roads they lead to (and never ramps). Only the main carriageway stays as the higher Road Type.
  • The angle at the beginning of the turn lane should be shallow, so that Waze says Keep Left / Right at that point.
  • The end of the turn lane should have a clear turn instruction near to the give-way point, unless the traffic merges onto the new road with right-of-way.