Closure procedures/en: verschil tussen versies Geschiedenis weergeven

(Nieuwe pagina aangemaakt met 'Exceptions: * Ramps are not closed if they are part of a bigger route closure. * No short closures are entered for mowing activities. * Closures of parallel road...')
Geen bewerkingssamenvatting
 
(4 tussenliggende versies door dezelfde gebruiker niet weergegeven)
Regel 24: Regel 24:
<br>
<br>


===Afsluitingen op provinciale wegen===
===Closures on provincial roads===
Afsluitingen op provinciale wegen worden ingevoerd vanuit de wegwerkzaamheden op [[Wegstatus.nl|Wegstatus]].
Closures on provincial roads are entered via the road works option in [[Wegstatus.nl|Wegstatus]].
De reden hiervan is dat provincies vaak gebruik maken van <i>Actueel melden</i>. Dit betekend dat ze geautomatiseerd wegen eerder of later dicht kunnen zetten. Wegstatus neemt dat automatisch over. <br>
The reason for this: provinces often use <i>Actueel melden</i>. This means that they can close roads automated, more early or at a later time. Wegstatus uses these updates. <br>
<br>
<br>


===Afsluitingen op gemeentelijke wegen===
===Closures on municipal roads===
Voor de gemeentelijke wegen geldt, invoeren via [[Wegstatus.nl|Wegstatus]] mag, maar via [[Waze Map Editor|WME]] ook.<br>
Closures on municipal roads: entering the closure details can be done in [[Wegstatus.nl|Wegstatus]], but also via the [[Waze Map Editor|WME]].<br>
Voordeel via Wegstatus is dat gemeenten die van <i>Melvin</i> gebruik maken hiermee actuele wijzigingen kunnen doorvoeren en dat deze dan automatisch worden doorgevoerd.<br>
Advantage of entering via Wegstatus: when municipalities enter their closures in <i>Melvin</i>, possible changes are automatically updated in Wegstatus.<br>
   
   
__NOTOC__
__NOTOC__
{{Bottomline}}
{{Bottomline}}

Huidige versie van 27 okt 2020 om 09:43

Andere talen:

Closure procedures

What is the best place to enter Real Time Closures? In the WME or via Wegstatus? Below you find some guidelines.

You can enter Closures in Wegstatus manually and Wegstatus also uses closure information from various other sources like the NDW (the Nationale Databank Wegverkeergegevens). This includes data from SPIN (Rijkswaterstaat) and VCNL (RVM network), Andes LTC (Municipalities and provinces) and Melvin (Municipalities and provinces).

Pro's and con's

  • Advantage of adding the closure data via Wegstatus: the closure is as up-to-date as possible. Roadwork updates have immediate effect on the closure.
  • Possible downside of adding the closure data via Wegstatus: Sometimes the source data is removed to be added via a new report later on. The closure is marked completed in Wegstatus after the deletion. This issue will be solved at end 2020.


Closures on national roads

As a standard National road closures are not entered in advance. When a road closes we get a report in the #feed-wegafsluitingen channel.
National roads, are those roads that are maintained by Rijkswaterstaat. See also RWS Wegenoverzicht.

Exceptions:

  • Ramps are not closed if they are part of a bigger route closure.
  • No short closures are entered for mowing activities.
  • Closures of parallel roads along National roads, like for instance the A4 at Schiphol, A2 at Utrecht, are not send to #feed-wegafsluitingen (except if both the main as parallel roads are closed).


Closures on provincial roads

Closures on provincial roads are entered via the road works option in Wegstatus. The reason for this: provinces often use Actueel melden. This means that they can close roads automated, more early or at a later time. Wegstatus uses these updates.

Closures on municipal roads

Closures on municipal roads: entering the closure details can be done in Wegstatus, but also via the WME.
Advantage of entering via Wegstatus: when municipalities enter their closures in Melvin, possible changes are automatically updated in Wegstatus.


Main Page | Index